Capture and Regeneration of Subtle Energy Resonance Signals

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for capture, recording, and regeneration of subtle energy resonance signals are described herein. A system for capturing and recording the signals may include an antenna array disposed within an electromagnetic shield, a signal processor, and a memory coupled to at least one processor. The antenna array may include at least one antenna comprising a conductive disk and an amplifier circuit board, the antenna array detecting and receiving subtle energy resonance signals from a source. The signal processor converts the analog signals into digital signals, which are then stored into the memory. The electromagnetic shield houses the antenna array and minimizes electromagnetic interference with the received signal. Such a controlled environment ensures the purity of the recorded subtle energy resonance signals for regeneration. Regeneration is accomplished with a second antenna coupled to a digital regeneration device for short-range broadcasting, affecting manifestations of subtle energy resonance in a subject.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This non-provisional patent application claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application No. 62/495,539, entitled “Method and apparatusto record & playback subtle energy resonance,” filed on Sep. 19, 2016,which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates generally to personal wellness devicesand, more particularly, to the capture and regeneration of subtle energyresonance signals.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Evidence for resonance between objects is widely understood andrecognized throughout standard Newtonian mechanics and generallyemployed through standard Maxwell's electrodynamics. Physicists refer tothis classical energetic model as the U(1) gauge state. Subtle energyresonance manifestation may arise from the application of ambientelectromagnetic (EM) waves. From cell to bone, the human body iscomposed almost entirely from complex crystalline arrays built fromcarbon, calcium, sodium, potassium, and magnesium, with other tracemineral compounds. As a result, the state and growth of this biodynamicliving crystalline structure may be influenced, guided, and imprinted bythe exposure to an overlay of global and local EM systems. Integratedcircuits, including memories with millions of highly-ordered crystallinemineral lattice systems, can reasonably emulate the resonant functionsof natural crystals with respect to receiving, storing, transforming,and radiating EM waves of specific frequencies.

While EM radiation emanating from the human body can be measured andrecorded, large amounts of unnatural, ambient EM noise constantlysurrounds most environments due to the presence of EM waves at multiplefrequencies from high-powered radio communication and other moderntechnologies. The effect of ambient or directed EM upon any crystallinearray depends on the resonant susceptibility of the specific array. Thepast century, beginning with the crystal radio leading up to the learnedexploitation of the EM spectrum primarily for high-powered radiocommunication of ever increasing, higher frequencies, has created anomnipresent smog of unnatural ambient EM called noise. Therefore,Faraday cages are often used for any sensitive experiment that mustfilter out ambient EM noise, in order to have sufficient signal to noiseratio (SNR) for a successful reception, recording, storage and isolationof a radiated signal.

In contrast to conventional radio communication, which concentratespower at a particular frequency in the EM spectrum, subtle energy mayinstead be characterized by a broad but specific resonance anddistribution of harmonics, sub-harmonics, and super-harmonics.Difficulties in studying subtle energy resonances may include ambient EMnoise interference, lack of reliable instrumentation with respect toreal-time detection, storage, and analysis. Thus, there is thereforealso a long-standing need for an improved system, apparatus, and methodfor detecting, storing, and regenerating utilizing manifestations ofsubtle energy resonance. It is to be understood that the regeneration ofsubtle energy resonance signals includes re-emitting, rebroadcasting,reproducing, replaying, playback, re-radiating, or other suitable methodof effecting manifestations of subtle energy resonance.

SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in asimplified form that are further described in the Detailed Descriptionbelow. This summary is not intended to identify key features oressential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended tobe used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subjectmatter.

Some embodiments of the present disclosure include a system forrecording subtle energy resonance, comprising: (a) an electromagneticshield, (b) an antenna array disposed within the electromagnetic shield,the antenna array having at least one antenna, each antenna comprising:(i) a housing; (ii) a conductive disk, coupled to the housing, thatreceives at least one subtle energy resonance signal from a source; and(iii) an amplifier circuit board coupled to the conductive disk; (c) amulti-channel signal processor coupled to each antenna of the antennaarray, the multi-channel signal processor converting the at least onesubtle energy resonance signal into at least one digital subtle energyresonance signal; and (d) a memory coupled to at least one processor andthe multi-channel signal processor, the processor storing the digitalsubtle energy resonance signals into the memory.

Various embodiments of the present disclosure include a method forcapturing and recording subtle energy resonance signals, comprising:receiving a subtle energy resonance signal, via an antenna array, from asource, the antenna array having at least one antenna comprising: ahousing, a conductive disk, and an amplifier; amplifying the subtleenergy resonance signal, via the amplifier; converting, via a signalprocessor, the subtle energy resonance signal into a digital subtleenergy resonance signal; transmitting, via the signal processor, thedigital subtle energy resonance signal to a computing device having oneor more processors and a memory; and storing, via the one or moreprocessors, the digital subtle energy resonance signal into the memory.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure includes a system forregeneration of subtle energy resonance, comprising: (a) at least oneprocessor; (b) a memory coupled to the at least one processor, thememory including at least one stored subtle energy resonance signal; (c)a signal processor communicatively coupled to the at least one processorand the memory, the signal processor having a digital-to-analogconverter that converts the at least one stored subtle energy resonancesignal into at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal; and (d)at least one antenna electrically coupled to the signal processor, eachantenna of the at least one antenna including a spiral coil having aplurality of loops, such that each antenna regenerates the at least oneanalog subtle energy resonance signal.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, where like reference numerals refer toidentical or functionally similar elements throughout the separateviews, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated inand form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrateembodiments of concepts that include the claimed disclosure, and explainvarious principles and advantages of those embodiments.

The methods and systems disclosed herein have been represented whereappropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only thosespecific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments ofthe present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with detailsthat will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the arthaving the benefit of the description herein.

FIG. 1 is a system for capturing and recording subtle energy resonancesignals, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 illustrates a front view of an exemplary antenna for capturingsubtle energy resonance signals, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 depicts a front view of the exemplary antenna of FIG. 2 with asensor plate cover removed, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a system for regeneration of stored subtle energy resonancesignals, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a representation of an exemplary signal regeneration pancakecoil antenna, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 shows a front view of an exemplary portable regeneration antennaand digital regeneration device.

FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of the system for capturing andrecording subtle energy resonance signals, according to the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 8 is a simplified block diagram of the system for regeneration ofstored subtle energy resonance signals, according to the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a method for recording subtle energyresonance signals, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a method for regeneration of subtleenergy resonance signals, according to the present disclosure.

FIGS. 11a-11f show results of clinical studies performed using thesubtle energy resonance regeneration system on bacterial cultures.

FIGS. 12a-12b show results of clinical studies recording the effect ofthe subtle energy resonance regeneration system on the electricalproperties of human DNA.

FIG. 13 is a block diagram of an example computer system that may beused to implement embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While this technology is susceptible of embodiment in many differentforms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described indetail several specific embodiments with the understanding that thepresent disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of theprinciples of the technology and is not intended to limit the technologyto the embodiments illustrated. The terminology used herein is for thepurpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended tobe limiting of the technology. As used herein, the singular forms “a,”“an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unlessthe context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understoodthat the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” and/ or“including,” when used in this specification, specify the presence ofstated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/orcomponents, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or moreother features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components,and/or groups thereof. It will be understood that like or analogouselements and/or components, referred to herein, may be identifiedthroughout the drawings with like reference characters. It will befurther understood that several of the figures are merely schematicrepresentations of the present technology. As such, some of thecomponents may have been distorted from their actual scale for pictorialclarity.

The present disclosure generally relates to systems and methods ofsignal analysis and generative response. More specifically, the presentinvention focuses on control of manifestations of subtle energyresonance. An event that can be reliably detected and recorded, such asa change in value of natural electromagnetic radiation emanating fromselect human body subjects, may fall within this analysis and control.Reciprocally, intentional replication of an event detected and recordedshould produce a determinable effect in subtle energy resonance.

The present disclosure is directed to various embodiments of systems andmethods for recording, analyzing, manipulating, and producing subtleenergy resonance signals. In some embodiments, the systems and methodsinclude an antenna array to receive subtle energy resonance signals froma designated energy environment. The designated energy environment andthe antenna array may be disposed within a multi-layer Faraday cage toprotect against electro-magnetic noise and to ensure the purity of thereceived subtle energy resonance signals. The antenna array is thencoupled to a multi-channel signal processor and a computing device toprocess and to record the subtle energy resonance signals into a memory.In certain embodiments, the systems and methods include an antenna forshort-range broadcasting of the recorded subtle energy resonance signalsto affect the subtle energy resonance in a biological subject. Furtheraspects of the systems and methods will be described in greater detailbelow in reference to the figures.

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a subtle energy resonancerecording system 100. In various embodiments, the system 100 includes atleast one antenna 130 (collectively referred to as an antenna array), anelectromagnetic (EM) Faraday cage shield 140, a second electromagnetic(EM) Faraday shield 145, a signal processor 150, a converter 160, and acomputing device 170. In some embodiments, the system 100 furthercomprises a recording room microphone 180 a and a reference microphone180 b communicatively coupled to a second signal processor 190. Thesystem 100 provides accurate and real-time detection, recording,storage, and analysis of subtle energy resonance with minimalinterference by ambient EM noise.

The at least one antenna 130 of the antenna array is directed atreceiving subtle energy resonance signals emitted from a source 110(e.g. a subtle energy resonance source) within a recording room. Thesource 110 may also be described as a biological agent, subject, orinstrument of non-local quantum energy. In some embodiments, the source110 is a human subject. It is to be understood that the source 110 isnot limited to human subjects, but may also comprise other biologicaland non-biological matter that emits subtle energy resonance. The subtleenergy resonance signals emitted from the source 110 alter an EM fielddisposed within an energy environment 120 contained within the EMFaraday cage shield 140. The changes in the EM field actuate the atleast one antenna 130, such that the at least one antenna 130 receivesthe subtle energy resonance signals. The antenna array will be describedin greater detail below and in reference to FIGS. 2-3.

The EM Faraday cage shield 140 includes an electrically conductivematerial that forms a Faraday cage with a separate signal processingroom sharing a common shielded wall to protect the system 100 from EMinterference. The cables are routed in a right angle crossingconfiguration to minimize undesired coupling of noise or crosstalk. Thecables may comprise sets of twisted pairs within a multiple shieldedsheath, which eliminates crosstalk and EMF interference. The EM Faradaycage shield 140 utilizes multiple isolated and insulated layers toreject common-mode coupling from inside to outside. The outermost layeris well grounded to the outside ground via a low impedance connection toa grounding rod, driven into Earth ground. The innermost layer iselectrically isolated from ground. Having an innermost and outermostlayer minimizes outside EMF interference, including AC noise, over awide bandwidth of possible interfering signals. Isolation frominfrasound band EMF interference is highest in a layered Faraday cagedesign, such as EM Faraday cage shield 140. As such, in one or moreembodiments, the electrically conductive material is structured as adouble-walled mesh or solid. As a result, the EM Faraday cage shield 140can be used as an isolation chamber to test various commercial productsthat emit EMF interference or AC noise. In various embodiments, system100 includes an EM Faraday cage shield 145 which includes anelectrically conductive material to protect the system 100 from EMinterference. The signal processor 150, converter 160, computing device170, and signal processor 190 are disposed within the EM Faraday cageshield 145. It is to be understood that the EM Faraday cage shield 145may be constructed the same or similar to the EM Faraday cage shield140, as previously described, or may be composed of different materialand be constructed with a different size and shape.

The signal processor 150 is communicatively coupled to the antennaarray. The signal processor 150 comprises at least one input port thatreceives the captured subtle energy resonance signal from each of the atleast one antenna 130. In certain embodiments, each of the at least oneantenna 130 transmits the captured subtle energy resonance signal alongan XLR cable. Each XLR cable may be coupled to a DB25 to XLR inputcable, which is then coupled to the signal processor 150. In one or moreembodiments, for example, the received signals are 24-bit signals at afidelity of approximately 0 Hz to 65 Hz, with a high signal-to-noiseratio (SNR). The signal processor 150 may be coupled to the antennaarray with a plurality of XLR cabling. The signal processor 150 may alsoprovide the antenna array with power connected to a low noise FETamplifier signal processing board.

The signal processor 150 further includes an analog-to-digital (A/D)converter. The signal processor 150 converts the captured subtle energyresonance signal from analog into a digital subtle energy resonancesignal suitable for processing and storage on the computing device 170.In some embodiments, the A/D converter samples the incoming analogsignal at a sampling frequency of at least 192 kHz at 24-bit depth. Oneof ordinary skill in the art would understand an audio file sampled froma signal at 192 kHz at 24-bit depth to be a high resolution audio file.It is to be understood that the signal processor 150 may also be knownas an audio interface.

In certain embodiments, the system 100 comprises the converter 160 whichincludes one or more inputs having a first type of port, and one or moreoutputs having a second type of port. For example, the converter 160 mayreceive a signal using a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) inputport, and may transmit the signal using a Thunderbolt output port. It isto be understood that other suitable protocols may be used for the inputand output, such as PCI Express, Universal Serial Bus (USB), USB-C,Firewire, or other suitable protocol to communicate between the signalprocessor 150 and the computing device 170.

The computing device 170 is communicatively coupled to, and receives thesubtle energy resonance signal from, the signal processor 150. Incertain embodiments, the computing device 170 is coupled to the signalprocessor 150 via the converter 160. An example computing device 170 isshown and described in FIG. 13, including at least one processor and amemory. The computing device 170, via the at least one processor,receives the digital subtle energy resonance signal from the signalprocessor 150 or the converter 160. The computing device 170 then storesthe digital subtle energy resonance signal into memory for laterregeneration. The computing device 170 may also tune, filter, adjust oneor more features of, or otherwise enhance the subtle energy resonancesignal prior to or after storage in memory.

In one or more embodiments, the system 100 further comprises therecording room microphone 180 a, the reference microphone 180 b, and thesecond signal processor 190. Each voice recording microphone 180 a, 180b may comprise cardioid condenser microphones, or other suitablemicrophones for receiving acoustic signals as reference only, for thebenefit of a time signature. The recording room microphone 180 a ismounted to a ceiling towards a center of the recording room to capture arecording room acoustic signal emitted from the source 100. It is to beunderstood that the recording room microphone 180 a may be disposed atany suitable location within the EM Faraday cage shield 140 to recordacoustic signals from the source 100. The reference microphone 180 b isdisposed within the signal processing room, the reference microphone 180b capturing a reference acoustic signal.

The second signal processor 190 may be coupled to the recording roommicrophone 180 a, the reference microphone 180 b and the computingdevice 170. The second signal processor 190 receives the recording roomacoustic signal and the reference acoustic signal from the recordingroom microphone 180 a and the reference microphone 180 b, respectively.The second signal processor 190 may have similar functions to the signalprocessor 150, such as converting the analog acoustic signals intodigital acoustic signals, and transmitting the digital acoustic signalsto the computing device 170. The computing device 170 processes andstores the digital recording room acoustic signal and the digitalreference acoustic signal into memory. The second signal processor 190may also couple to the recording room microphone 180 a and the referencemicrophone 180 b.

In some embodiments, the computing device 170 records subtle energyresonance signals separately from each antenna 130. In an example with afirst, a second, a third, and a fourth antenna, the computing device 170receives a first, a second, a third, and a fourth digital subtle energyresonance signal.

FIGS. 2-3 depict exemplary views of an antenna 200 that may be used asthe antenna 130. In various embodiments, the antenna 200 includes asensor plate cover 202, a housing 204, a contact lead 212, a mountingplate 214, a signal processing circuit board 216, and an XLR cable 218.In some examples, the housing 204 includes a body 206, an upper opening208 and an aperture 210. The body 206 may have a side wall 206 a and abottom portion 206 b, and be made of a thin, solid aluminum, or anyother suitable conductive material to create a partial Faraday cagesurrounding the signal processing circuit board 216. It is to beunderstood that the body 206 of the housing 204 may be constructed tohave any size or shape, or be made of any suitable material, tofacilitate receiving subtle energy resonance signals with minimalinterference. The antenna 200 detects changes in local EM fields assubtle energy resonance signals.

As shown in FIG. 2, the sensor plate cover 202 acts as a sensingantenna, which may be constructed as an electrically conductive diskcoupled to housing 204. The sensor plate cover 202 is coupled to theupper opening 208, and the contact lead 212. Changes in the local EMfield, or fluctuations in SU(2)/U(1) mixed gauge symmetries, willmanipulate charges in the sensor plate cover 202, which will transmit adetected analog signal to the contact lead 212.

As shown in FIG. 3, the contact lead 212 is coupled to the signalprocessing circuit board 216. The signal processing circuit board 216receives subtle energy resonance signals from the sensor plate cover viathe contact lead 212. The signal processing circuit board 216 acts as alow noise, signal conditioning Field-Effect Transistor (FET) receivercircuit board that amplifies the received subtle energy resonance signalfor transmission along the XLR cable 218. The signal processing circuitboard 216 may have one or more FETs having high input impedance and lowoutput impedance, which are regulated by an applied power. The antenna200 is thus capable of adjusting amplitude of the received subtle energyresonance signal before transmitting the signal via the XLR cable 218.

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of a subtle energy resonanceregeneration system 400. In various embodiments, the system 400 includesat least one antenna 430 (or (EM) antenna), an EM Faraday cage shield440, an EM Faraday cage shield 445, a first amplifier 450 a, a secondamplifier 450 b, a signal processor 460, a converter 470, and acomputing device 480. The system 400 affects subtle energy resonance ofa subject 410 with a stored subtle energy resonance signal amplified andregenerated through the at least one antenna 430. It is to be understoodthat the EM shield 440, the EM Faraday cage shield 445, the signalprocessor 460, the converter 470, and the computing device 480 may bethe same, or have similar components and functionality, as the EM shield140, the EM Faraday cage shield 145, the signal processor 150, theconverter 160, and the computing device 170, respectively. It is also tobe understood that the regeneration of subtle energy resonance signalsincludes re-emitting, rebroadcasting, reproducing, replaying, playback,re-radiating, or other suitable method of effecting manifestations ofsubtle energy resonance. Furthermore, the regenerated subtle energyresonance emitted from the at least one antenna 430 is dependent on theregeneration of the same high fidelity of the original subtle energyresonance recorded by the system 100.

The computing device 480 comprises subtle energy resonance signalsstored in memory. In some embodiments, the computing device 480 iscommunicatively coupled to the converter 470 and transmits the storedsubtle energy resonance signals to the signal processor 460 via theconverter 470 for regeneration. In other embodiments, the computingdevice 480 may be directly coupled to the signal processor 460. Thestored subtle energy resonance signals are stored in digital format, andmay be stored as a 24-bit Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) audio file orother suitable audio format for storing high quality signals. An examplecomputing device 480 is shown and described in FIG. 13.

The converter 470 includes one or more inputs having a first type ofport, and one or more outputs having a second type of port. For example,the converter 470 may receive a signal using a Thunderbolt input port,and may transmit the signal using a PCI output port. It is to beunderstood that other suitable protocols may be used for the input andoutput, such as PCI Express, USB, USB-C, Firewire, or other suitableprotocol to communicate between the signal processor 460 and thecomputing device 480.

The signal processor 460 receives the stored energy resonance signalfrom the computing device 480. The signal processor 460 may include adigital-to-analog (D/A) converter that converts the received storedsubtle energy resonance signal from digital to an analog subtle energyresonance signal suitable for regeneration through the at least oneantenna 430.

The signal processor 460 is communicatively coupled to the firstamplifier 450 a and the second amplifier 450 b. The first amplifier 450a and the second amplifier 450 b receive subtle energy resonance signalsfrom the signal processor 460 for regeneration. In an example embodimentin which the at least one antenna 430 comprises four antennas, fouroutputs (one for each of the at least one antenna 430) of the signalprocessor 460 are each coupled to separate channels. The separatechannels may comprise mono D-subminiature (D-sub) to RCA cables. In someembodiments, a first and a second channel of the separate channels arecoupled to a left and right input on the first amplifier 450 a,respectively. A third and fourth channel of the separate channels may becoupled to a left and right input on the second amplifier 450 b,respectively. It is to be understood that a number of amplifierscoupling the signal processor 460 to the at least one antenna 430 mayvary depending upon the number of antenna.

The first amplifier 450 a and the second amplifier 450 b amplify thereceived subtle energy resonance signal prior to transmitting the signalto the at least one antenna 430. In some embodiments, the firstamplifier 450 a and the second amplifier 450 b are dual channel FETamplifiers with four channel amplification. In the example embodimentwith four antenna, the first amplifier 450 a is communicatively coupledto a first and a second antenna, and the second amplifier 450 b iscommunicatively coupled to a third and a fourth antenna. The firstamplifier 450 a and the second amplifier 450 b may be coupled to the atleast one antenna 430 via XLR cables spliced at an amplifier connectionpoint.

In various embodiments, the at least one antenna 430 are disposed ineach corner of the EM Faraday cage shield 440, which may be the same EMFaraday cage shield as the EM Faraday cage shield 140 used forrecording. An exemplary antenna that may be used as one of the at leastone antenna 430 is shown and described in FIG. 5. The at least oneantenna 430 receives an amplified subtle energy resonance signal fromeither the first amplifier 450 a or the second amplifier 450 b, andradiates the amplified subtle energy resonance signal towards a subject410 in an energy environment 420, thus affecting the subtle energyresonance of the subject 410.

FIG. 5 illustrates a representation of a multi-turn, pancake spiral coil500 that may be used in the at least one antenna 430 or 130. In one ormore embodiments, the coil 500 comprises a plurality of loops 502 andelectrical contact leads 504, 506. The coil 500 may comprise anysuitable electrically conductive wire or etched conductive PCB traceleads for conducting a subtle energy resonance signal and generating asubtle energy resonance field from the subtle energy resonance signal.Furthermore, the plurality of loops 502 may comprise any number ofloops, at any suitable density, size or shape for radiating the stored,transmitted, and amplified subtle energy resonance signal and affectingsubtle energy resonance of the subject 410. In one or more embodiments,each loop of the plurality of loops 502 comprises a predetermined ratiobetween a predetermined height and predetermined width of each loop.

FIG. 6 depicts an exemplary portable subtle energy resonanceregeneration system 600 having an antenna 610 coupled to a digitalregeneration device 620. The portable subtle energy resonanceregeneration system 600 emits a subtle energy resonance signal to alocalized area. Thus, in various embodiments, the portable subtle energyresonance regeneration system 600 affects the subtle energy resonance ofa subject without requiring a connection to external power or anotherdevice. The subtle energy resonance emitted from the portable subtleenergy resonance regeneration system 600 is dependent on theregeneration of the same high fidelity of the original subtle energyresonance recorded by the system 100. Furthermore, the radiatedelectromagnetic field (EMF) from a portable subtle energy resonanceregeneration system of the present disclosure has been tested. Theresults confirm a 20 dB lower amplitude than the EMF radiation from acommon cell phone or laptop computer, which was also measured. Inaddition, the reduction in the AC noise levels were also verified usingan AC Gaussmeter made by Integrity Design and Research, Inc.

In one or more embodiments, the digital regeneration device 620 is ahandheld high-resolution audio player having at least one processor, amemory, a power source, and featuring a Burr Brown or equivalentdigital-to-analog converter capable of regeneration of 24-bit, 192 kHzPCM audio files. A stored subtle energy resonance signal is transferredfrom a data storage, such as data storage 750 described below, into thememory of the digital regeneration device 620. For example, the digitalregeneration device 620 may be coupled via USB cable to a computingsystem used for signal capture, such as computing device 170. Capturesoftware stored in a memory of the computing device is executed by aprocessor to export a predetermined subtle energy resonance signal as afull resolution, 24-bit, 192 kHz PCM Waveform Audio File Format (WAV)file. It is to be understood that the stored subtle energy resonancesignal may be formatted in any file format suitable for the digitalregeneration device 620. The digital regeneration device 620 receivesthe subtle energy resonance signal and stores the signal into the memoryof the digital regeneration device 620 for regeneration. Furthermore,the power source may be a rechargeable lithium polymer battery, or othersuitable battery for portable use.

The antenna 610 includes a multi-turn, pancake spiral coil 612 thatconducts a subtle energy resonance signal. In some embodiments, the coil612 is disposed on a printed circuit board (PCB) 614 and made of anysuitable conductive material. The coil 612 may be rectangular in shape,or any other suitable size and shape for affecting the subtle energyresonance of the subject. Furthermore, the coil 612 may have anysuitable number of rotations. Leads 616 a, 616 b are coupled to andpowered by the digital regeneration device 620 via a 3.5 mm headphonejack 618 and a 3.5 mm headphone jack socket 622. In particular, lead 616a at the center of the coil 612 is coupled to a first lead of the 3.5 mmheadphone jack 618. The lead 616 b at a corner of the coil 612 iscoupled to a second lead of the 3.5 mm headphone jack 618. It is to beunderstood that any suitable configuration of audio connector may beused in place of the 3.5 mm headphone jack 618 and the 3.5 mm headphonejack socket 622. In one or more embodiments, the antenna 610 is coupledto and mounted on a first portion of the digital regeneration device620.

The digital regeneration device 620 transmits the subtle energyresonance signal stored in memory to the antenna 610 via the 3.5 mmheadphone jack 618. The regeneration antenna 610 emits the subtle energyresonance signal outwards, away from a face of the coil 612, to affectthe subtle energy resonance of the subject proximate to the portablesubtle energy resonance regeneration system 600. In one or moreembodiments, the subject is a predetermined distance away from theregeneration antenna 610 during regeneration, where the predetermineddistance may be dependent upon the size of the coil, amplification inthe system 600, and/or other suitable factors. The regenerated subtleenergy resonance signal comprises EM energy within the audio spectrum ata bandwidth and clarity of signal without amplification of EMFinterference or introduction of A/C noise to maintain the fidelity ofthe original signal.

FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of the system 700 for capturing andrecording subtle energy resonance signals of FIG. 1. The system 700includes subtle energy resonance signals 710 received by an antennasensor 720. In one or more embodiments, the antenna sensor 720 comprisesthe sensor plate cover 202. The antenna sensor 720 transmits thecaptured subtle energy resonance signal to a FET receiver circuit board730, or other suitable on-board signal processor for amplifying thecaptured subtle energy resonance signal. The FET receiver circuit board730 may comprise the signal processing circuit board 216.

A signal processor 740 receives the captured and amplified subtle energyresonance signal from the FET receiver circuit board 730, and convertsthe received signal into a digital subtle energy resonance signal. Incertain embodiments, the signal processor 740 is the signal processor150. The signal processor 740 then transmits the digital subtle energyresonance signal to data storage 750 for later regeneration. The datastorage 750 may be a memory disposed within the computing device 170.

FIG. 8 is a simplified block diagram of the system 800 for regenerationof subtle energy resonance signals. In certain embodiments, the system800 represents either the regeneration system of FIG. 4 or the portableregeneration system of FIG. 5. Digital subtle energy resonance signalsare stored in a data storage 840 as a full resolution 24-bit, 192 kHzPCM WAV file, or other suitable format. The data storage 840 maycomprise either the memory disposed within the computing device 480 orthe memory coupled to the digital regeneration device 620. In someembodiments, the data storage 840 may be the same data storage as thedata storage 750, or may comprise digital subtle energy resonancesignals transferred from the data storage 750.

A regeneration device 830 receives the stored subtle energy resonancesignal from the data storage 840, converts the stored subtle energyresonance signal into an analog subtle energy resonance signal, andtransmits the analog subtle energy resonance signal to the antenna 820.In one or more embodiments, the regeneration device 830 comprises thesignal processor 460, the first amplifier 450 a and the second amplifier450 b. In other embodiments, the regeneration device 830 comprises thedigital regeneration device 620. The antenna 820 then radiates thesubtle energy resonance signal to affect the subtle energy resonance ofa subject. The antenna 820 may comprise either the at least one antenna430 or the antenna 610.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram showing a method 900 for capturing andrecording subtle energy resonance signals, according to an exampleembodiment. The method 900 can be implemented using the capturing andrecording system 100 shown in FIG. 1. In block 902, the method 900 cancommence with standardizing the input power level for a subtle energyresonance signal.

In block 904, the method 900 includes receiving the at least one subtleenergy resonance signal via at least one antenna, such as the at leastone antenna 130. In block 906, the method 900 optionally includesamplifying, via at least one amplifier, the at least one subtle energyresonance signal prior to transmission to a signal processor. Theamplifier may comprise an amplifier circuit such as the signalprocessing circuit board 216. In block 908, the method 900 includesconverting the at least one subtle energy resonance signal from ananalog signal to at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal viaa signal processor, such as signal processor 150. In block 910, themethod 900 includes inputting the at least one digital subtle energyresonance signal to a computing device, such as an exemplary computingdevice shown in FIG. 13 or the computing device 170. Block 910 mayfurther include analyzing the amplitude and frequencies of the at leastone digital subtle energy resonance signal to initially standardize aninput power level for all recorded subtle energy resonance signals byapplying appropriate filtering. Amplification of the subtle energyresonance signals at block 906 may appropriately be adjusted to controlthe quality of the incoming signal. The dashed arrow in FIG. 9represents optionally standardizing the input power level for therecorded subtle energy resonance signals and commencing again at block902. In block 912, the method 900 includes storing the at least onedigital subtle energy resonance signal into memory. Storing the at leastone digital subtle energy resonance signal may include mixing each ofthe at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal into a singlemono, stereo, or quad file for regeneration. In certain embodiments, thesingle stereo file is a single stereo 192 kHz at 24-bit depth file.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram showing a method 1000 for regeneration ofsubtle energy resonance signals, according to an example embodiment. Themethod 1000 can be implemented using the system 400 shown in FIG. 4, orthe system 600 shown in FIG. 6. In block 1002, the method 1000 cancommence with retrieving, via at least one processor, a stored subtleenergy resonance signal from a memory or data storage. The at least oneprocessor and the memory or data storage may correspond to the computingdevice 470, for example. In block 1004, the method 1000 includesconverting, via a signal processor, the stored subtle energy resonancesignal from a digital signal to an analog subtle energy resonancesignal. In some embodiments, the signal processor is the signalprocessor 460, or in other embodiments the signal processor is thedigital regeneration device 620. In block 1006, the method 1000optionally includes amplifying, via an amplifier, the analog subtleenergy resonance signal. In certain embodiments, the amplifier includesthe first amplifier 450 a or the second amplifier 450 b. In block 1008,the method 1000 includes outputting and transmitting, via an antenna,the analog subtle energy resonance signal to affect the subtle energyresonance of a subject. The antenna, in some embodiments, comprises theat least one antenna 430, or the antenna 610.

In various embodiments, the subtle energy resonance regeneration systemof 4.6, 10 is used to charge water with one or more subtle energyresonance signals. One or more of the methods of the present disclosuremay be used to regenerate the one or more subtle energy resonancesignals applied to the water. Studies described below illustrate thatcharged water, water that has been subject to the one or more subtleenergy resonance signals, enhances the growth of bacterial culturesafter an initial inhibition of growth, due to acclimation. Studies alsoshow that charged water increases the conductivity of human DNA. Thecharged water may be used in growing crops, farming, agriculture,raising of livestock, and general consumption by people for personalwellness.

Clinical Study Measuring Effects of Subtle Energy Resonance System onBacterial Cultures

As described in Appendix A entitled, “The Effects of Chi Box Technologyon Bacterial Cultures in the Laboratory” by Beverly Rubik, Ph.D., andHarry Jabs, M. S., the effectiveness of the subtle energy resonanceregeneration system according to the present disclosure was clinicallyinvestigated for its ability to facilitate growth of wild type E. colibacteria cultures in the laboratory. This clinical study was conductedto investigate whether subtle energy resonance regeneration frequencieshave an effect on heat-shocked (stressed) bacteria cultures to look foran impact on the culture growth of the well-known microbe, E. coli. Inaddition, a further clinical study was conducted on healthy growingbacterial cultures (not heat-shocked) for comparison.

A bioassay that had previously shown positive effects on culture growthfrom Reiki healer treatments which involved heat-shocked cell cultureswas used. Both heat-shocked cultures and healthy cultures were studiedin short and long-term clinical studies with the subtle energy resonanceregeneration system. Long-term clinical studies utilized simultaneousmeasurements of light scattering from the bacterial cultures usingreal-time computer data acquisition.

In particular, five clinical studies were done using two differentresearch designs: (1) Bacterial colony counts via plate count assay weredone in three clinical studies; and (2) Light scattering from the turbidliquid bacterial cultures was assessed in two clinical studies. Whereasthe plate count assay shows short-term effects on culture growth, thelight scattering assay is capable of showing long-term effects of thetreatment on culture growth.

Preparation of the Bacterial Cultures:

The standard wild type strain (K12) of E. coli bacteria purchased from aculture collection corporation (Microbiologics, St. Cloud, Minn.) wasinoculated into aqueous nutrient broth and incubated on a rotating waterbath overnight at 37 C (human body temperature, the optimal temperaturefor E. coli ). This initial culture was inoculated into 50 ml liquidminimal medium to support growth of E. coli (Vogel-Bonner-citratesolution with 1% D-glucose as carbon source). This stock culture wasgrown overnight in the rotating water bath at 37 C and was the inoculumused in all clinical studies. Fresh cultures of E. coli were grownovernight on minimal medium to mid-logarithmic growth phase for eachclinical study. Each culture was centrifuged, washed, and resuspended infresh liquid medium, and the absorbance at 600 nm, an indicator ofculture density, was measured in a UV-visible spectrophotometer.Absorbance was adjusted to 0.15-0.3 by dilution with fresh minimummedium. Five ml of bacterial suspension of this stock culture wastransferred into 6 sterile clear polycarbonate culture test tubes withplastic caps. Three culture samples were randomly assigned to the testgroup (subtle energy resonance regeneration treatment) and to thecontrol group and labeled accordingly, such that triplicate samples wereused for each condition. These constituted the culture samples to beused in the daily clinical studies.

For heat-shock clinical studies, the culture samples were placed in awater bath at 50 C for 25 min. This temperature and exposure time hadbeen previously determined to inactivate (i.e., kill) 50% of the E. colibacteria, which is known as the LD50 (lethal dose for 50% of thebacteria).

Three different types of clinical studies were done: (1) plate countassay following heat shock; (2) light-scattering assay on heat-shockedbacterial cultures over time; and (3) lightscattering assay on normalbacterial cultures (not heat shocked) over time.

Plate Count Assay to Count Viable Bacteria:

In previous studies, Reiki masters and other healers had been shown tostimulate bacterial growth following heat shock using the followingbioassay. The same research protocol was repeated here, except that nohealers were used; instead, the subtle energy resonance regenerationtreatment was used. Immediately after the heat shock, bacterial culturetubes were removed from the hot water bath. Cultures to be treated bythe subtle energy resonance regeneration were placed in a rack,uncovered, and a bottom portion of the regeneration system was centeredover the open test tubes, such that the bottom of the regenerationsystem was 2.5 inches from the bacteria. The regeneration system was setto 120, the highest intensity. The control culture samples were placedin a test tube rack in another room 10 to 15 feet from the treatmentgroup and remained there for the duration of the treatment. Thetreatment times used varied from 12 minutes to 36 minutes, according tothe four treatment programs of the regeneration system. One of the foursubtle energy resonance regeneration treatments was selected for eachclinical study.

After the treatment period, the culture samples were placed in a 37 Cshaking water bath for 75 minutes of recovery and growth. Then theculture samples were placed in an ice water bath at 0 C for threeminutes to stop growth. Following that, the culture samples were diluted1:10 with phosphate-buffered saline (0.05M sodium-potassium phosphatewith 0.15M NaCl), a standard solution used to dilute bacterial culturesfor the plate count assay. Serial dilutions of 1:10 were made 5 times,such that a final dilution of the bacterial cultures of 1 part in 10E-5was obtained.

A 0.1 ml aliquot of the final dilution of each culture sample was platedusing sterile technique onto duplicate plates containing 3%agarose/nutrient broth. This is the standard plate count assay todetermine the number of living bacteria present, measured by countingthe number of colonies that grow on the plates. The plates were placedinto an incubator overnight maintained at 37 C. The bacterial coloniesthat resulted from the growth of single cells on each plate were thencounted 3 to 5 times each using an automated colony counter. The platecount values for test and control conditions were each averaged,standard deviations calculated, and the data analyzed for statisticalsignificance.

Light Scattering Assay Procedures:

Sample cultures were prepared as described previously. Treated andcontrol cultures were placed on a 37 C shaking water bath for theduration of the clinical study. At various time intervals up to 3+hours, the sample cultures were placed within a device consisting of analuminum block with sample wells inside a dark chamber with LEDs(light-emitting diodes) and detectors for simultaneous light-scatteringmeasurements. The light scattered from the cultures at a 90 degree angleto the incident light beams passed through a red (600 nm) filter andlight-sensitive PIN diodes (p-type, intrinsic, and n-type layeredsemiconductors) were used as sensitive light detectors.

Real-time data acquisition was used to collect the data as opticalsignals from each culture, which were amplified, processed, and recordedsimultaneously on a computer. Immediately after each timed measurement,cultures were returned to the 37 C water bath for further growth. Bythis means, the culture samples were measured simultaneouslyapproximately every 30 minutes to yield seven measurements over 3 ormore hours to look for any changes following subtle energy resonanceregeneration treatment compared to controls. This method should amplifyany differences between the treatment and control cultures over time. Inone clinical study conducted using this method, heat-shocked bacterialcultures were studied; in another clinical study on another day usingthis method, normal bacterial cultures were studied.

Clinical Studies Performed:

Five clinical studies were performed over five days: (1) S101, 12minutes, heat-shocked bacterial cultures, plate count assay; (2) E201,15 minutes, heat-shocked bacterial cultures, plate count assay; (3)S101, 36 minutes, heat-shocked bacterial cultures, plate count assay;(4) S101, 24 minutes, heat-shocked bacterial cultures, light scatteringassay; and (5) S101, 36 minutes, normal bacterial cultures, lightscattering assay.

FIG. 11a depicts the results of Clinical study 1: S101, 12 minutes,heat-shocked bacterial cultures, plate count assay. Average plate countvalues are shown in FIG. 11a , and error bars indicate one standarddeviation from the mean values. T-test (2-tailed, unpaired)=0.487, whichmeans that the results of this particular clinical study show 0.3%difference, which is not a significant difference in bacterial growthbetween the subtle energy resonance regeneration treated and controlcultures.

FIG. 11b shows the results of Clinical study 2: E201, 15 minutes,heat-shocked bacterial cultures, plate count assay. Average plate countvalues are shown in FIG. 11b , and error bars indicate one standarddeviation from the mean values. T-test (2-tailed, unpaired)=3.5 E+7,meaning that p is much less than 0.0001. Thus, the results of thisparticular clinical study indicate a highly significant differencebetween the subtle energy resonance regeneration treated and controlcultures. Results show that the subtle energy resonance regenerationtreated cultures grow less than controls in terms of the numbers ofviable bacteria. Treated bacterial cultures showed 10.9 percent lessgrowth than controls.

FIG. 11c illustrates the results of Clinical study 3: S101, 36 minutes,heat-shoked bacterial cultures, plate count assay. Average plate countvalues are shown in FIG. 11c , and error bars indicate one standarddeviation from the mean values. T-test (2-tailed, unpaired)=, 1.72E-20,meaning that p is much less than 0.0001. Thus, the results of thisparticular clinical study indicate a highly significant differencebetween subtle energy resonance regeneration treated and controlcultures. Results show that the subtle energy resonance regenerationtreated cultures grow significantly less than controls in terms of thenumbers of viable bacteria. Treated bacterial cultures show 11.7 percentless growth than controls.

FIG. 11d depicts a comparison of the magnitude of the growth-suppressingeffect on E. coli cultures for Clinical studies 1-3 using differentsubtle energy resonance regeneration treatments and the plate countassay, indicating the percent difference in diminished bacterial growthfrom the controls. The 12 minute treatment of S101 produces the smallesteffect (0.3%), whereas the 15 minute treatment of E201 produces 10.9%,and the 36-minute treatment of S101 produces 11.7% change in bacterialgrowth. The subtle energy resonance regeneration treatments diminishedbacterial growth over controls. Moreover, the longer the treatmentduration, the greater the diminished effect on bacterial growth,suggesting a dose-response effect over the short term.

FIG. 11e shows the results of Clinical study 4: S101, 24 minutes,heat-shocked bacterial cultures, light scattering assay. FIG. 11e showsthe percentage change in bacterial culture turbidity over 3+ hours asassessed by light scattering, a measure of long-term growth changes. Thecurve shows changes over controls, a value of 40% indicates 40% greaterthan controls. The curve indicates a lag in initial growth for the firsthour followed by the treated cultures showing significantly increasedgrowth over controls from 100 minutes post-treatment onward. The maximumdifference between controls and treated culture samples is 43%difference at 170 min post-treatment, which is a significant difference.

FIG. 11f illustrates the results of Clinical study 5: S101, 36 minutes,normal bacterial cultures, light scattering assay. FIG. 11f shows thepercentage change in bacterial culture turbidity as assessed by lightscattering over 3+ hours duration post-treatment, which is a measure oflong-term growth changes. The curve shows a steady increase in growth oftreated cultures over controls that is significant. A 40% differencefrom controls was found due to the subtle energy resonance regenerationtreatment which is highly significant at 3+ hours post-treatment.

Results from the plate count assay show that heat-shocked bacteria arefirst diminished in viable cell count in the first hour post-treatment.However, results from light scattering clinical studies show that thetreated cultures grow up to 40% more than controls at 3+ hourspost-treatment. Moreover, results on healthy cultures (not heat-shocked)in light scattering clinical studies show growth stimulation by subtleenergy resonance regeneration treatment is increased up to 40% overcontrols at 3+ hours post-treatment. Therefore, the light scatteringmethod showed the long term growth-stimulating effects of the subtleenergy resonance regeneration treatment that could not be observed bythe short term plate count assay.

Short-term effects (first hour) after subtle energy resonanceregeneration treatment on heat-shocked bacteria, as measured via platecount assays, showed that bacterial growth was reduced over controls.There appears to be a dose-response for this growth inhibition, in thata longer subtle energy resonance regeneration treatment reducedbacterial growth more significantly than a short-term treatment.However, long-term effects of subtle energy resonance regenerationtreatment on heat-shocked bacteria, as measured via scattered lightintensity over 3+ hours post-treatment showed an initial lag in growthfor the first 60 minutes followed by up to 40% increased growth overcontrols.

Note that both FIGS. 11e, 11f show a lag time in the initial 60 minutespost-treatment, during which time the treated cultures did not differmuch from the controls. For ease of comparison the graphs in bothfigures are plotted with the same axis scales. The lag time isespecially prominent in FIG. 11e for the heat-shocked cultures, and lessso for the healthy growing cultures. At longer times, the differencesbetween controls and treated cultures are large and significant.Therefore, the light-scattering method showed long-termgrowth-stimulating effects of the Chi Box treatment that could not beobserved by the short-term plate count assay.

The results are consistent with the conclusion that the bacterial growthresponse to subtle energy resonance regeneration treatment forheat-shocked cultures is biphasic, with a short-term effect ofdiminished growth followed by a long-term effect of enhanced growth.Following heat shock, bacteria cultures treated by subtle energyresonance regeneration signals first diminish in viable cell number upto 75 minutes, but later recover dramatically to grow much faster thancontrols, on the order of 40% greater growth at 3+ hours post-treatment.

It is possible that a biphasic response was observed with the subtleenergy resonance regeneration treatment because the clinical studiesused a high intensity to treat the bacterial cultures, which may haveinitially thwarted their growth and yet stimulated their recovery andgrowth over the long term. A biphasic response was not observed withReiki healers or any other healers whom were previously studied usingthese same bacterial growth bioassays for biofield therapy. There exist,however, other instances of biphasic responses in biology, in which anapplied stimulus produces inhibitory as well as stimulatory effects.This suggests that subtle energy resonance regeneration signals have anunderlying differential effect on certain internal life processes. It ishighly unlikely that there was a microbial contaminant in the cultures,which were handled carefully by sterile technique, and which contained amedium that exclusively supports E. coli and closely related entericbacteria.

In the single clinical study conducted on normal bacterial cultureswithout heat shock, 36 minutes of subtle energy resonance regenerationtreatment was found to stimulate growth over controls steadily overtime, from 7% in the first 60 min to 35% over controls at 200 minutes.Therefore, it appears that the subtle energy resonance regenerationtreatment steadily increases growth of normal healthy E. coli cultures(that are not heat-shocked) over controls. In this case, we observed thetypical exponential bacterial growth curve, with a treatment effect ofthe order of 40% increased growth over controls at 3+ hourspost-treatment.

Effect of Subtle Energy Resonance Regeneration on the ElectricalProperties of Human DNA

As described in Appendix B entitled, “Effect of Chi Box Programs onElectrical Properties of Human DNA” by Glen Rein, Ph. D., the electricalproperties of the human body can be characterized in terms of itsclassical and non-classical behavior. Classically speaking, electronsflow linearly between two local regions of opposite charge. However,there are now experimental demonstrations that electrons also tunnelbetween two points. This quantum tunneling has been recently beenmeasured in biological systems in general, and in DNA molecules inparticular. In DNA, quantum tunneling occurs within the hydrogen bond,which holds the two strands together. Thus, the more hydrogen bonds in asystem, the more expressed is this quantum property. More hydrogen bondsare created when separated DNA strands recombine and wind back into itsintact helical structure. Previous research indicates that bio-energyemitted from a variety of different healing arts practitioners caneither wind or unwind human DNA depending on their conscious intention.Thus, healers who increase rewinding are increasing the number ofhydrogen bonds and thus activating DNA at the quantum level.

The quantum properties of DNA can also be measured using a techniquecalled non-linear dielectric spectroscopy. In this technique,current-voltage measurements demonstrate discrete current spikes atspecific excitation frequencies in biological systems and water.Researchers also mathematically modeled this behavior as Josephsonsupercurrent mediated by intrinsic coherence domains. Therefore,current-voltage measurements measure macroscopic quantum coherentbehavior of biomolecules, as well as intrinsic frequency information.Thus, it has been observed experimentally that maximum current-voltageresponses correlate with an increased probability of quantum tunneling.

Another experimentally observed phenomena associated withcurrent-voltage measurements is frequency hopping/shifting where a givenfrequency peak will show up shifted to higher or lower frequencies uponrepeat measurements. Researchers have demonstrated that the frequencyhopping/shifting occurs in biomolecules, crystals and in lasers. Forexample, the dielectric properties of crystals show discrete peaks whichshift to a higher frequency when the temperature is increased.Researchers conclude that such frequency shifts were related tofrequency hopping when electrical current moves through a material(charge carrier transport). Frequency hopping is considered a quantumproperty of the system being measured. Due to frequency hopping, datacollected in the present study was calculated as percent occurrence—howmany times a measurement response occurred at a specific frequency.

Electrical measurements at a specific resonance frequency also exhibitnon-local quantum behavior. Such behavior includes resonance emissionsof highly coherent light, electron tunneling and resonant interactionsbetween molecules. In light of the quantum processes associated withresonance conditions, the likelihood that such processes underlie theinduced current response, measured in the present clinical studies, itis likely that the reported electrical resistance data will be a mixtureof quantum and classical behavior.

In the present study, nonlinear dielectric spectroscopy was used tomeasure intrinsic frequencies of human DNA. DNA is stimulated with aweak electric field at varying frequencies (1 Hz to 100 kHz) and theinduced current is measured. Since resonance and frequency hopping arequantum properties of DNA, it is proposed here that the non-classicalenergy emitted from the subtle energy resonance signals producedaccording to the present disclosure can best be measured in a quantumsystem like DNA.

In addition to measuring the dielectric properties (current-voltageresponses) of DNA, a second method was used in the present study, whichinvolves measuring the electrical conductivity of DNA. Electricalconductivity refers to the movement of electrons from a negativelycharged region (of a cell or a bio-molecule) to a positively chargedregion. In the case of proteins, electrical current will flow along astrand from a negatively charged amino acid to a positively chargedamino acid. In DNA, electrons will flow from a hydroxyl (OH—) ion to anamine (NH3+). Although electrical properties of bio-molecules correlatewell with their well-established physical-chemical properties, it isonly recently that scientists have begun to seriously investigate theelectrical properties of bio-molecules. In general it is known thatincreasing electrical conductivity makes biological systems functionmore efficiently.

Electrical conductivity of DNA, for example, is well known to occuralong its central axis and across individual strands. In the case ofDNA, conductivity measures correlate with the functional activity of DNArepair. Thus, increasing conductivity is associated with increasedability of DNA to repair itself and repaired DNA has 20-fold higherconductivity than the same DNA when damaged. Increased conductivity ofDNA is also associated with enhanced intrinsic self-assembly processes.On the other hand, large decreases in conductivity are associated withmismatched DNA strands.

Increased electrical conductivity (or decreased resistance) indicatesthat electron movement is either sped up or stronger in amplitude. Inthe human body, increased electrical conductivity is associated withenhanced wound-healing and DNA self-repair. In the present clinicalstudies, electrical conductivity refers to the ability of electrons topropagate between sending and receiving electrodes, although what wasactually measured is the ability of DNA to resist that flow ofelectrons.

Therefore the goal is the study was to determine whether the energyemitted by any of the subtle energy resonance regeneration systems ofthe present disclosure can alter the dielectric properties(current-voltage response) or the electrical conductivity of human DNA.To achieve these goals the following experimental procedures werefollowed in two separate clinical studies. The first clinical study wasdone with nine different subtle energy resonance regeneration programsand the second clinical study was done on the two similar de-stressprograms.

Method 1: Measuring intrinsic frequencies of biomolecules

Dielectric spectroscopy is a technique involving current-voltagemeasurements, which generates frequency information about molecules. Amodified version of dielectric spectroscopy was used in the presentstudy where two electrodes from a potentiometer are inserted directlyinto the solvent and into the DNA solution. Proprietary modifications ofstandard dielectric spectroscopy typically include: (1) takingexperimental measurements under resonance conditions; (2) calculatingprobabilistic occurrences of voltage spikes (not signal strength); or(3) using non-Euclidean geometry to design appropriateantenna/electrodes. When 15 sequential measurements are taken in a row,the magnitude of the induced current response at a particular frequencyvaries considerably.

If the induced current response is particularly strong, it can beconsidered coherent (laser-like). Moderate and weak current responseswere also observed. When calculating the final percent occurrence valuesan occurrence was recorded whether it was small, medium or large inmagnitude. In the present study, measurements were taken at a variety ofexcitation conditions by adjusting the frequency (from 10 to 100 kHz)and amplitude (from 1-20 mV) of the voltage spike. A series of 12-15independent sequential measurements were taken for each sample. Avoltage spike is generated from one electrode and the induced currentsignal (in nanoamperes) is recorded in the second electrode

The data was transferred to an Excel spreadsheet for analysis. Due to aphenomenon known as frequency hopping, the amplitude (strength) of theinduced current response at a given frequency cannot be measured as withnormal spectroscopic techniques. Therefore, how often the induced signalappeared, percent occurrence, at each excitation frequency was measuredand used to obtain the intrinsic frequencies of DNA. The percentoccurrence is a measure of signal strength at each frequency (see datain FIG. 12a ).

Method 2: Measuring Frequency-Specific Electrical Resistance

Electrical conductivity can be readily measured using commercial digitalconductivity meters. Technically these meters measure resistance andthen convert it to conductivity. Resistance to current is measured inkilohms using a fixed frequency between 1-3 kHz. This frequency rangewas arbitrarily chosen and is very limited.

The technique also measures electrical conductivity in terms ofresistance (kilohms), but takes measurements at specific frequencieshigher than 3 kHz. A specific frequency was chosen based on theintrinsic frequencies of the DNA which were predetermined using themethod (1) as described in part I. All electrical resistancemeasurements were done using method (2) before and after exposing theDNA to the energy emitted from the subtle energy resonance regenerationsystem for varying amounts of time. Thirty minute exposures were optimaland used in all clinical studies.

Results

When measuring the intrinsic frequencies of DNA, the solvent (distilledwater) was measured first. Then the contribution of the solvent wassubtracted from the measurements of the DNA sample which also containedwater, so that the intrinsic frequencies of the DNA itself could becalculated. Raw data for these calculations are not shown, but theintrinsic frequencies of 22.4, 28.2, 35.5, 42.2, 44.7, 53.1, 70.8 and84.1 kHz were obtained.

FIG. 12a shows percent decrease in electrical resistance of DNA aftertreatment with various programs (measured in kilohms) with a toleranceof +/−4% of the first clinical study. Using the strongest intrinsicfrequency of 22.4 kHz from above, electrical resistance was measuredusing method (2) in kilohms for both the solvent and the DNA. The finalresistance was calculated by subtracting these two measured values. Inall cases, the resistance decreased after exposure to the energy emittedby the subtle energy resonance regeneration system. The reciprocalrelationship between resistance and conductivity illustrates that allsubtle energy resonance regeneration programs caused an increase inconductivity.

The data in FIG. 12a was calculated as the percent decrease inresistance relative to the initial value before treatment. Percentdecrease can be considered a measure of the strength of the effect. Thisraw data is presented in vertical axis in FIG. 12a . The numbers of thehorizontal axis represent the different subtle energy resonanceregeneration programs. Repeat control measures vary by 8% or less. Asobserved in FIG. 12a , program 6-9 overlap the range of the control whenerror bars are included. Therefore, five programs (1-5) where error barsdo not overlap are statistically significant. This method is analternative to using t-tests to determine statistical significance. The5 significant programs are addictions, alleviating allergies,alleviating Lyme and both de-stress programs.

FIG. 12b shows percent change (compared to controls) for two de-stressprograms at chosen DNA frequencies of the second clinical study. Thedata in FIG. 12b was obtained by measuring frequency information in DNAbefore and after treatment with two subtle energy resonance regenerationprograms using method (1). The results are calculated as average percentoccurrence values (strength of the signal) from twelve independentclinical studies. These selected frequencies were chosen because theyoccur where large differences between treated and untreated (control)DNA samples were observed and are not necessarily intrinsic frequenciesof DNA as previously identified. These differences were plotted in FIG.12b as percent change relative to controls at certain frequencies. Themagnitude of these differences was as much as 3 to 4-fold indicating thesensitivity of the response.

Discussion and Conclusion

Measuring electrical resistance using the intrinsic frequencies of thetarget is a new bio-assay which allows measurement of the quantumproperties of DNA. The increased sensitivity of the assay allowsdiscrimination between the different programs stored in the subtleenergy resonance regeneration system of the present disclosure.Pain-killer (addiction) and allergies were the most effective atdecreasing the electrical resistance of human DNA in vitro (see FIG. 12a). In addition, both de-stress programs and the Lyme program also showedlarge decreases. In all five of these programs a statisticallysignificant effect was observed. The magnitude of this effect was 14%,which is similar to that observed in previous clinical studies whenother healers treated DNA directly and conformational changes orfrequency changes.

The liver detox program on the other hand did not decrease DNAresistance. Programs that have a weak effect on DNA will likely haveother beneficial healing effects on the body mediated by othermechanisms which are not DNA-dependent.

The second part of this study, method (1) was used to measure theeffects of the two de-stress programs in detail. The two de-stressprograms were chosen because they were also being evaluated in aseparate study in a different lab where the two de-stress programs wereboth effective at stimulating bacteria growth. The data in FIG. 12acompares the same intention (to de-stress) held by two differentpractitioners. Although these two programs could not be distinguished byelectrical resistance measures, the intrinsic frequency method didreveal differences. At certain frequencies, the strength of the signal(percent occurrence) response was different. At some frequencies theS101 program produced a large effect, but the E201 program did not. Atother frequencies the E201 program produced a large effect, but the S101signal did not. Only at 79 and 89 kHz did both programs have a similarstimulatory effect, although the effect at 89 kHz was somewhat weaker.Both programs activate five intrinsic frequencies, although the signalstrength at each frequency is different. This pattern information can beused in future studies to distinguish other subtle energy resonanceregeneration programs.

The method (2) measures the electrical properties using an intrinsicfrequency of the specific bio-molecule of interest. Intrinsicfrequencies of DNA were pre-determined using a separate technique ofmethod (1). The technique is a modification of dielectric spectroscopyfor measuring electrical changes at specific frequencies. Using thestrongest measured intrinsic frequency of DNA (22.4 kHz), electricalresistance of DNA was then determined, using method (2) before and afterexposure to 9 different programs in the subtle energy resonanceregeneration system of the present disclosure. All programs decreasedthe electrical resistance of DNA except the liver program. Theaddiction/pain killers program and the allergy program were the mosteffective. The maximum effect observed showed a 14% decrease compared tocontrols which is similar to previous clinical studies by the authorusing other healers who treated the DNA directly.

A second set of clinical studies measured changes in DNA's own intrinsicfrequencies in response to the two de-stress programs using method (1).Signal strength at certain frequencies showed a 3 to 4-fold increasecompared to untreated controls. The method could distinguish betweenthese two similar programs where resistance measures could not. The twomethods show that the subtle energy resonance regeneration systemradiates an energy which changes the electrical properties of human DNA.

FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary computer system 1300, which may be 170or 480, that may be used to implement some embodiments of the presentdisclosure. The computer system 1300 of FIG. 13 may be implemented inthe contexts of the likes of computing systems, networks, servers, orcombinations thereof. The computer system 1300 of FIG. 13 includes oneor more processor unit(s) 1310 and main memory 1320. Main memory 1320stores, in part, instructions and data for execution by processorunit(s) 1310. Main memory 1320 stores the executable code when inoperation, in this example. The computer system 1300 of FIG. 13 furtherincludes a mass data storage 1330, portable storage device 1340, outputdevices 1350, user input devices 1360, a graphics display system 1370,and peripheral devices 1380.

The components shown in FIG. 13 are depicted as being connected via asingle bus 1390. The components may be connected through one or moredata transport means. Processor unit(s) 1310 and main memory 1320 isconnected via a local microprocessor bus, and the mass data storage1330, peripheral device(s) 1380, portable storage device 1340, andgraphics display system 1370 are connected via one or more input/output(I/O) buses 1390.

Mass data storage 1330, which can be implemented with a magnetic diskdrive, solid state drive, or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatilestorage device for storing data and instructions for use by processorunit(s) 1310. Mass data storage 1330 stores the system software forimplementing embodiments of the present disclosure for purposes ofloading that software into main memory 1320.

Portable storage device 1340 operates in conjunction with a portablenon-volatile storage medium, such as a flash drive, floppy disk, compactdisk, digital video disc, or USB storage device, to input and outputdata and code to and from the computer system 1300 of FIG. 13. Thesystem software for implementing embodiments of the present disclosureis stored on such a portable medium and input to the computer system1300 via the portable storage device 1340.

User input devices 1360 can provide a portion of a user interface. Userinput devices 1360 may include one or more microphones, an alphanumerickeypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alphanumeric and otherinformation, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus,or cursor direction keys. User input devices 1360 can also include atouchscreen. Additionally, the computer system 1300 as shown in FIG. 13includes output devices 1350. Suitable output devices 1350 includespeakers, printers, network interfaces, and monitors.

Graphics display system 1370 includes a liquid crystal display (LCD) orother suitable display device. Graphics display system 1370 isconfigurable to receive textual and graphical information and processesthe information for output to the display device.

Peripheral devices 1380 may include any type of computer support deviceto add additional functionality to the computer system 1300.

The components provided in the computer system 1300 of FIG. 13 are thosetypically found in computer systems that may be suitable for use withembodiments of the present disclosure and are intended to represent abroad category of such computer components that are well known in theart. Thus, the computer system 1300 of FIG. 13 can be a personalcomputer (PC), handheld computer system, telephone, mobile computersystem, workstation, tablet, phablet, mobile phone, server,minicomputer, mainframe computer, wearable, or any other computersystem. The computer may also include different bus configurations,networked platforms, multi-processor platforms, and the like. Variousoperating systems may be used, including UNIX, LINUX, WINDOWS, MAC OS,PALM OS, QNX ANDROID, IOS, CHROME, TIZEN and other suitable operatingsystems.

Transmission media may include coaxial cables, copper wire, gold wire,and fiber optics including various computer busses. Transmission mediacan also take the form of acoustic, magnetic, electromagnetic, or lightwaves such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared(IR) data communication. Carrier wave or other media for transmission ofinformation signals may also be used. Various forms of transmissionmedia may be involved in carrying one or more signals, singly or incombination, to a target subject for subtle energy resonance.

Such receiving and regeneration subtle energy resonance systems asdescribed in the disclosed embodiments have been shown to havebeneficial results in resolving, modifying, reducing, changing, andameliorating biological conditions in target subjects of various typesincluding cellular organisms to human organisms.

The use of the present disclosure with long term storage of subtleenergy resonance signals has opened a new field of study that promisesto impact the integrative health profession. Tuning, filtering,amplitude adjustment, or any other signal enhancement of the recordedsubtle energy resonance signal are utilized for manipulation of cellresonance during regeneration transmission, and are contained within thescope of the present disclosure. Embodiments of the present disclosuremay also be used for research to provide a desired resonance in asubject. In addition, EM Faraday cage shields of the present disclosuremay provide isolation chambers to test various commercial products thatemit EMF interference or AC noise.

While the present disclosure has been described in connection with aseries of preferred embodiments, these descriptions have been presentedby way of example only and are not intended to limit the scope of theappended claims to a particular form set forth herein. Thus, the breadthand scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited to any of theabove-described exemplary embodiments. To the contrary, the presentdescriptions are intended only to cover such alternatives,modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the scope andspirit of the present disclosure as defined by any appended claims andotherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. The scope ofthe present disclosure should, therefore, be determined not withreference to the above description, but instead should be determinedwith reference to the full scope of equivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for capturing, recording and regeneration of subtle energy resonance, comprising: a) an electromagnetic shield; b) an antenna array disposed within the electromagnetic shield, the antenna array having at least one receiving antenna operable to capture subtle energy resonance signals, each receiving antenna comprising: i) a housing; ii) a conductive disk, coupled to the housing, that receives at least one subtle energy resonance signal from a source; and iii) an amplifier circuit board coupled to the conductive disk; c) a multi-channel signal processor coupled to each receiving antenna of the antenna array, the multi-channel signal processor converting the at least one subtle energy resonance signals into the at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal, and storing the at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal into a memory; d) a signal processor for regeneration communicatively coupled to the at least one processor and the memory, the signal processor having a digital-to-analog converter that converts the at least one stored subtle energy resonance signal into at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal; and e) at least one regeneration antenna electrically coupled to the signal processor, each regeneration antenna of the at least one regeneration antenna including a spiral coil having a plurality of loops, such that each regeneration antenna regenerates the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal.
 2. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the electromagnetic shield includes a double-wall of conductive material that forms a Faraday cage.
 3. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the housing is made of a conductive material to form a Faraday cage to reduce AC noise.
 4. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the amplifier circuit board includes at least one field-effect transistor.
 5. The system as recited in claim 1, further comprising: a second signal processor communicatively coupled to the at least one processor and the memory; and a recording room microphone, communicatively coupled to the second signal processor, that receives at least one recording room acoustic signal from the source.
 6. The system as recited in claim 5, further comprising: a reference microphone, communicatively coupled to the second signal processor, that receives at least one reference acoustic signal from a control room.
 7. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the multi-channel signal processor includes an analog-to-digital converter that samples at a sampling frequency of at least 192 kHz at 24-bit.
 8. The system as recited in claim 1, further comprising: a first amplifier, communicatively coupled to the signal processor and a first and a second antenna of the at least one antenna, the first amplifier amplifying the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal and transmitting the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal to the first and the second antenna.
 9. The system as recited in claim 1, further comprising: a second amplifier, communicatively coupled to the signal processor and a third and a fourth antenna of the at least one antenna, the second amplifier amplifying the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal and transmitting the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal to the third and the fourth antenna.
 10. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the system for regeneration of subtle energy resonance is portable.
 11. The system as recited in claim 10, wherein the spiral coil of the at least one antenna is disposed on a printed circuit board.
 12. The system as recited in claim 10, wherein each loop of the plurality of loops has a predetermined ratio between a predetermined height and a predetermined width of the loop.
 13. A method for capturing, recording, and regeneration of subtle energy resonance signals, comprising: capturing at least one subtle energy resonance signal, via an antenna array from a source, the antenna array having at least one capturing antenna comprising: a housing, a conductive disk, and a first amplifier; amplifying, via the first amplifier, the at least one subtle energy resonance signal; converting, via a first signal processor, the at least one subtle energy resonance signal into at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal; inputting, via the first signal processor, the at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal into a computing device having one or more processors and a memory; and storing, via the one or more processors, the at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal into the memory; receiving, via one or more processors, the at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal from the memory; converting, via a second signal processor, the at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal into at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal; amplifying, via a second amplifier, the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal, the second amplifier being communicatively coupled to the second signal processor and at least one regeneration antenna; and outputting and transmitting the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal via the at least one regeneration antenna.
 14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein the converting the at least one subtle energy resonance signal into at least one digital subtle energy resonance signal includes sampling at a sampling frequency of at least 192 kHz at 24-bit.
 15. The method as recited in claim 13, further comprising: receiving, via a recording room microphone, a first reference acoustic signal from the source for the benefit of a time signature.
 16. The method as recited in claim 15, further comprising: receiving, via a reference microphone disposed in a signal processing room having the first signal processor, a second reference acoustic signal for the benefit of a time signature.
 17. The method as recited in claim 13, further comprising: analyzing an amplitude and a frequency of the at least one subtle energy resonance signal; and standardizing an input power level of the at least one subtle energy resonance signal based on the analysis.
 18. The method as recited in claim 13, further comprising: electromagnetically shielding an energy environment comprising the source and the antenna array to block electromagnetic interference.
 19. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein each antenna of the at least one regeneration antenna includes a spiral coil having a plurality of loops, such that each regeneration antenna regenerates the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal.
 20. The method as recited in claim 19, wherein transmitting the at least one analog subtle energy resonance signal includes disposing the at least one regeneration antenna a predetermined distance away from a subject receiving the at least one regenerated analog subtle energy resonance signal. 